Legal Review of the Principle of Lapse of a Grant (Grant Becomes Inoperative)
- Law Applied: Section 76(e) of the Law of Succession Act.
- Explanation: When all administrators of an estate die before completing the distribution, the grant becomes “inoperative”.
- Implication: A new grant must be issued—not by substitution, but by issuing letters of administration de bonis non (Latin: “of the goods not yet administered”).
📌 Comparison: This principle mirrors decisions in other jurisdictions like England & Wales, where courts also issue administration de bonis non to fill in the gap when prior executors die.
Case Law Review and Applicability
📌 1. In re Estate of Waigwa Wachira (Deceased) [2017] KEHC 7917
- Facts: Original grant to widow and son; widow later died leaving unadministered estate.
- Holding: Son entitled to Letters de Bonis Non under Rule 20, Fifth Schedule, Law of Succession Act, to complete administration.
- Takeaway: Even for intestate estates, beneficiaries may apply for de bonis non grants to finish distribution.
📌 2. In re Estate of Goolamhoosain Manjee Keshavjee (Deceased) [2017] KEHC 1395
- Facts: Sole executor under will died before completion.
- Holding: Probate revoked; grant de bonis non with Will issued to another beneficiary.
- Takeaway: De bonis non grants are appropriate when executor (or administrator) dies without completing the estate, even where there's a will.
📌 3. In re Estate of Harrison Mbari Waithaka (Deceased) [2018]
- Facts: Both administrator and administratrix died leaving part of estate unadministered.
- Holding: Court granted Letters de Bonis Non; applied Section 76(e) and Fifth Schedule paragraphs 14,16,20.
- Takeaway: Reinforces that the estate doesn’t get frozen; new grant fills the gap left by deceased administrators.
📌 4. In re Estate of Ngaigwo M’Shomba (Deceased) [2019] KEHC 2362
- Facts: Application sought substitution of deceased single administrator without de bonis non.
- Holding: Court struck out the application, directing proper route is revocation under Section 76(e) and new de bonis non grant.
- Takeaway: Clarifies that one cannot simply substitute under Section 81; must revoke and seek de bonis non.
📌 5. Faith Wanjiku Maganjo v Rebean Muriithi Maganjo [2017]
- Facts: Substitution of administrator occurred without de bonis non grant.
- Holding: Recognized necessity of de bonis non; second administrator lawfully administered remaining estate.
- Takeaway: Validates de bonis non grants where administrators die but require formal issuance.
Additional Authorities:
- Langok Tioni (2009) – Grant de bonis non issued to enable completion of intestate estate administration.
- Henry Clement Wariithi [2017] – Confirms practice—even if paperwork titles are inconsistent, courts overlook technicalities when grant serves estate administration.
- Elizabeth Wanjiku Njoka [2016] KEHC 978 – Found original grant “useless and inoperative” after administrator’s death, supporting de bonis non issuance.
✅ Summary of Legal Landscape
Situation |
Correct Procedure |
Administrator/executor dies before completing estate |
Revoke original grant under Section 76(e) and apply for Letters de Administration de Bonis Non |
Applicants propose substitution under Section 81 or Rule 49 |
Court redirects to de bonis non route (irrelevant if all admins are deceased) |
Estate is intestate or testate |
De Bonis Non applies in both scenarios; source of grant (intestacy or Will) doesn’t matter |
Beneficiaries agree |
Courts require written consents, but lack of formal procedure isn’t fatal—substance over form prevails |
📚 Why This Matters
- These authorities create a consistent precedent under Kenyan law for handling incomplete estate administration due to death or incapacity of an administrator.
- They affirm that Section 76(e) + Fifth Schedule provide the legal foundation, not Section 81.
- Courts invariably prioritize completion of administration over rigid procedural compliance, especially where beneficiaries give consent.
No comments:
Post a Comment